We have decided upon the concepts that we want to imply on our theatre architecture at a degree of influence by our previous analysis. First concept that we found consensus was the idea of interactivity. We wanted to break the conventional input-output relationship between spectator and performer as well as their spatial correspondences stage and auditorium; in order to enhance the event of play to more holistic and reciprocal meaning.

Third and the last aspect of our theater, come up as an extension of previous aspect, the concept of fairness to be represented as being an open space. We wanted our theater being able to open to anyone without sort of restrictions, propose equal and high standard on perspective, air and light quality; not only for the subjects of event, but any user of the architecture.

Karl Popper describes democracy as limiting the power to be accumulated in one hand. A form of correspondence to this idea was brought form correspondence by Oswald Mathias Ungers’ proposal for Berlin; the analogy of archipelago to represent breaking of centralization, to prevent aagglomeration of all functions and possibilities of the city in a single central location. In our consideration, the form of an archipelago not only represents the focal point of the stage (break of hierarchy) but also allows us to blend definite distinction between the stage and the auditorium to increase interactivity. In another aspect, the use of archipelago is to allegorize the work of Ungers as creating a node or point of attraction within Berlin, through emphasizing and revitalizing the potential of public space in Plänterwald.

In our context, between from 1991 to 2001 as a result of rise of neoliberal policies in the world, Spreepark represents a model of privatized the public space. As a result of unfortunate set of events one of the important spaces in the City that has great potential become leftover space within the urban texture.

Mechanism to evolve stage for possible different demands of stage sets for the performances and the artist to reveal adaptability.

We have aimed to represent and reveal a space that is open and transitive: fairness without any constraints providing not only subjects of event but any users equal light air and perspective quality, adaptive: that is not only what we wanted for it to be but being able to evolve what its users want from it to be, and interactive: the one that breaking the input-output relationship between spectator and performer, propagate a new possibility and function for both the architecture and performance.